Having misunderstood the submission process for music, I received a letter from the copyright office threatening to change the date of receipt of my work given a payment shortfall.

I was immediately shocked. Having noted that the work was received by the copyright office, I went ahead and assumed it was protected. A friend wanted to play an aspect of one of my musical pieces on the radio, which he did, but it turns out I may not have been protected by the copyright office.

Furthermore, I have been sending my last collection of songs to various individuals, like the agent for Michael Tilson Thomas, who, in effect, could conceivably have had the work before the copyright office acknowledged its receipt.

Talk about casting a chill over my creative heart. So, I am currently waiting to hear from the copyright office to see how they side:

“You might get the original date or the date when we received the your complete payment. It will be up to the examiner to determination which date they will use.” This according to Felicia Dozier, Accounting Technician, Copyright Accounts Section.

Why would such a decision be up to an examiner? An individual?

The purpose of the Copyright Office is “To promote creativity by administering and sustaining an effective national copyright system.”

I realize that not making full payment and also getting protection may play into others having no impetus to complete their payments if copyright protection is assured. But, a person wanting to protect their creation(s) really has, at least as far as I can imagine, no interest in undermining their protection. Why would this be assumed? Why would mistakes be punished? I am not sure I understand the psychology or the intelligence of such a decision.

Then I come upon “The Final Rule Regarding Group Registration for Unpublished Works,” where “After soliciting comments, the U.S. Copyright Office adopted a final rule creating a group registration option for unpublished works, allowing registration of up to ten unpublished works for a single fee.” (See: https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/group-unpublished/). Who writes this stuff? Who comes up with these decisions?

Apparently, the rationale is “The rule offers a number of benefits over current practices: it will allow the Office to more easily examine each work for copyrightable authorship, create a more robust record of the claim, and improve the overall efficiency of the registration process.”

The problem is copyright protection shouldn’t be about the office or the officers. Submissions by creators, for example, is done with the intention that whatever was sent is contained on or as the medium submitted and does not need to be examined until a breach of copyright is found or a copyright needs protection. We don’t need “more robust records of the claim,” and the efficiency should simply be a receipt, cataloging, and enforcement of the rights of the owners of copyrights. A system should not send shivers down the spines of the creatives nor act to disenfranchise them. To limit my submissions to ten unpublished works for a single fee effectively cuts me out of the process altogether. I cannot afford to protect hundreds of musical works at $85 per 10 a pop. I sometimes write 10 compositions a day. As it stands, 350 works is nearly $3000, which is effectively beyond my ability to pay.

Who uses such phrases as “Final Rule.” Is this the end, the final say? How absurd and ridiculous!

I believe the Copyright Office may have written itself out of existence, undermined its mission.

Either the rules change to benefit the creators or there is no purpose for it, at least as far as I am concerned. It is certainly not serving The People, and for that reason it simply may not act in this way. As a governmental agency, it needs to be reined in and/or repopulated.

(First published at: https://medium.com/@savioni/what-is-going-on-at-the-copyright-office-9b36e733c958) on May 20.


  1. Disturbing, really. I wonder to the gloval extent of copyright law – do bew copyrights need to be applied in every different country and if so who is responsible? I must reasearch this!

  2. I am sorry, I can’t help you. I don’t know anything about copyright laws, Mario. I also understand your reasons for being angry with the Copyright Office. As Chris says, it is disturbing. Perhaps you could talk with other musicians and artist-writers in your area, people you can trust.

  3. You are very prolific. Perhaps you should just select a few of your best musical pieces to copyright and then you could afford it financially.

    • Hello Lourdes, thank you for your compliment. As for stemming my request for permission, the agency must, by its mission statement, by its mission statement and association with the government, insure that creativity of all is ensured. It makes no sense to qualify what is copyrightable. Everything we write/create is copyrightable. The question remains whether the government upon receipt of matter, must protect submitters, which it has at least as far as I have been submitting and conforming to its dictates, which made sense until now.

    • I am not sure they are rogue but frankly unqualified mentally to understand the mission of the government as a whole and specifically as to the mission of the Copyright Office in general. What I think happened is a certain number of people rose to the top, not because of their qualification but because of their seniority, and this shows by their actions and policy. Thankfully, people like President Trump are temporary. The language of the agency’s mission is clear. It is to insure and protect creativity. If anything should deter that mission and in this case imply that access be granted only to the wealthy, than it has failed as an institution of the government of the United States of America.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s